Clinical History Taking

Previous research has shown that physicians make a diagnosis from the patient’s history in 70-90% of cases. By the medical history, physicians garner 60–80 % of the information that is relevant for a diagnosis (Keifenheim 2015).

“history-taking” as a way of eliciting relevant personal, psychosocial and symptom information from a patient with the aim of obtaining information useful in formulating a diagnosis and providing medical care to the patient. The medical interview is seen as an encounter between physician and patient, both contributing to the results.

It tests both your communication skills as well as your knowledge about what to ask. That implies that you need to know what to ask.  Acronyms and mnemonics are commonplace in medical  and healthcare training.  The standard medical model employs the SOCRATES acronym.

Acronym used in medical history taking - Kings College London (2016)
SSiteWhere is the pain?
OOnsetWhen did the pain start, and was it sudden or gradual?
CCharacterWhat is the pain like? An ache? Stabbing?
RRadiationDoes the pain radiate anywhere?
AAssociationsAny other symptoms associated with the pain?
TTime courseDoes the pain follow any pattern? Is it getting better or worse?
EExacerbating/Relieving factorsDoes anything change the pain?
SSeverity

Clinical history taking is something that allied health professional, nurses, doctors and surgeons must be proficient at and engage with early on in their training. But what happens when the questions don’t flow? In podiatry training, alternative acronyms are used, though this demonstrates the ariation in the used of these methods ad brings into question their usefulness in al situations.

Common history taking acronyms used in podiatry
OOnsetOOnset
LLocationLLocation
DDurationDDuration
CCharacteristicsCCharacter of pain
AAggravating/Alleviating factorsIImpact
RRadiationPProgression
TTemporal PatternPPrevious treatment
SSeverityAAssociated symptoms

History taking can be regarded as a fine art.  It involves more than good communication skills; it systematically unravels the mystery of the patient’s symptoms and suggests the most likely diagnoses. 

The subjective history taking process is an interview, a conversation with the patient which should also help to establish aims and objectives, and potential barriers to any potential interventions. A well-interpreted history leads to an efficient, focused physical examination (Ramani 2004).

The nuance in carrying out a subjective interview is for it to be effective by using techniques such as active listening, reinforcement and motivational interviewing whilst also forming a picture of the potential problem that the dicsussion leads to.

References:

Subha Ramani (2004) Promoting the art of history taking, Medical Teacher, 26:4, 374-376, DOI: 10.1080/01421590410001683230

Tsukamoto, Tomoko & Ohira, Yoshiyuki & Noda, Kazutaka & Takada, Toshihiko & Ikusaka, Masatomi. (2012). The contribution of the medical history for the diagnosis of simulated cases by medical students. International Journal of Medical Education. 3. 78-82. 10.5116/ijme.4f8a.e48c 

Peterson MC, Holbrook JH, Von Hales D, Smith NL, Staker LV. (1992) Contributions of the history, physical examination, and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses. West J Med. 1992;156(2):163-5. 

Keifenheim, K.E., Teufel, M., Ip, J. et al. (2015) Teaching history taking to medical students: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 15, 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0443-x

The Concept Of A Clinical History

Previous research has shown that physicians make a diagnosis from the patient’s history in 70-90% of cases. By the medical history, physicians garner 60–80 % of the information that is relevant...

Read More

Articles

The more I think about the impact of clinical histort taking the more it seems to feed into so many aspects of MSK, podiatry, other specialisms within podiatry and learing on the undergraduate podiatry journey.   When I get the inspirations, I’ll add the articles.